Search
Functional Areas

Common risks identified in Global Fund projects 

Global Fund projects are implemented in rapidly changing and complex operating environments. Despite their differences, there are ranges of contextual, operational and institutional risks that impact the risk profile of Global Fund-funded projects. The Risk Catalogue for Global Fund projects  is a compilation of common risks faced by Global Fund-funded projects as reported by Project Management Units (PMUs), Country Offices, Regional Bureaus, audits, evaluations, and oversight. These risks are organised along the 8 UNDP ERM risk categories  and can be used as a practical input to support the risk identification process during project design, planning, and risk reviews. For each possible risk, a list of potential contributing factors/causes is provided to help with risk identification and analysis. It is recommended to ensure risk statements are as specific as possible, as per guidance in the Risk Reporting and Recording section of this Manual, and some suggestions are provided on this in the risk catalogue. The risk catalogue expands on the following common risks identified in Global Fund projects: 

1. Social and Environmental
  1. Human rights barriers and/or gender stigma
  2. Ineffective stakeholder engagement
  3. Sexual exploitation and abuse, and sexual harassment
  4. Community health, safety, and security incidents
  5. Unsafe working and labour conditions
  6. Pollution and healthcare waste
  7. Inadequate Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) and poor data quality
  8. Substandard quality of health products
  9. Drug stock outs and overstocks
  10. Poor warehouse management and inventory management system
  11. Delays in in-country distributions
  12. Delays in procurement/contracting
  13. Ineffective Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM)/board oversight
  14. Gaps in PMU’s human resources

Financial
  1. Ineligible expenditure
  2. Theft, diversion, or fraud of financial and non-financial assets
  3. Loss or damage to non-financial assets
  4. Low/delays in delivery
Operational
  1. Inadequate Sub Recipient (SR) internal controls, reporting, and compliance capacities
  2. Poor oversight of SR financial and programmatic performance
  3. Poor engagement in and effectiveness of TB interventions
  4. Poor engagement in and effectiveness of HIV interventions
  5. Poor engagement in and effectiveness of Malaria interventions
  6. Poor sustainability
  7. Inability to provide co-financing
Organisational
  1. Delays in submission of quality results reports
Reputational
  1. Public and donor opinion
Regulatory
  1. Changes in in-country regulatory framework
  2. Failure to observe UNDP policies and procedures
Strategic
  1. Delays in government decisions
  2. Changes in government
Safety and Security
  1. Safety risks for staff, Sub-recipients, or target groups